Since they continuously expel conditioned air from a building, fume cupboards are an extremely influential component of the building services engineering remit for many educational and research buildings. In a typical new university STEM building, where there might be from 30 to 130 fume cupboards, a complex interplay of face velocity, air flow rate, make-up air requirements and discharge velocities will have an impact on the design of HVAC systems and the required duct diameters and fan specifications. The design will have a significant impact on the awarding of
Modelling the effects of various fume cupboard configurations on building
services specifications requires product data to be in a BIM environment
As is the case with many other companies, our product data is set out in technical data sheets and operating manuals. In the BIM world we fully recognise this data must be readily available in a digital format for uploading into software such as Revit, for example.
|Discussions about how to maximise the usefulness of our BIM models |
for consulting engineers led to our involvment in the PDT project
Helpful discussions with Carl Collins, CIBSE digital engineering consultant, provided us with the official sanction to generate the official PDT for our product category.
So what’s involved? For all the sophistication of the software surrounding BIM, it must be emphasised to any manufacturer considering creating one that a PDT is, in essence, simply an Excel spreadsheet, and a standard Excel template which forms the basis of all new PDTs is available from CIBSE. Whilst the PDT’s format is determined by CIBSE, it is for us as the PDT originator to propose which product data to include and exclude.
The level of detail is key. Just as in a well-designed ‘lean’ Revit model to which the product data will be attached, a PDT’s level of detail should be just sufficient for purpose. As a manufacturer we hold a profusion of product data that would never be used in a BIM environment. At this point we found discussions of our initial thoughts with Buro Happold were invaluable. As a user of the data they were able to advise which parameters were critically important and in which units of measurement would be preferred.
|A well-designed BIM model should have just enough information to be useful|
As the originators of the PDT, we will always be consulted by CIBSE should any changes to it be proposed.
We are proud Safelab is playing a role in the CIBSE PDT project, whose outcome will help significantly in enabling the full potential of BIM to be realised, and look forward to the next step.
For any manufacturer thinking of generating a PDT, please get in touch at www.safelab.co.uk – we would be more than happy to share any knowledge and experience of the process. You will be placing yourself in the enlightened vanguard of your industry!
We have been helped on our PDT journey by the generous input of Jose Fandos at Buro Happold,
Rich Cole at SES Engineering Services, Eugene Sayers at Sheppard Robson, Tim Collins at GAMBICA and Carl Collins at CIBSE.