Reflections on our 'two years running'

By Brian Morris, Managing Director of Beverley Clifton Morris, winner of Building Services Consultancy of the year (up to 100 employees) 2014 and 2015


As I made my way down to Grosvenor House, London in February I had no expectations of winning an Award. My company, BCM, was a finalist in the Building Services Consultancy of the Year (under 100 employees) category at the CIBSE Awards 2015. As we headed to the hotel reception to greet my colleagues and our guests, I was determined to enjoy the evening, though had resigned myself to not being a winner on this occasion.

In 2014, we won the award. It was the first time we had entered and being called on stage had taken me by surprise. It was a fantastic, overwhelming experience and it took a good few days before it truly sunk in.

To be named as a finalist in 2015 and attend as ‘reigning champions’ was an honour. It recognised that we’d had an incredible 12 months in terms of growth, business wins, and key strategic developments, and were still ‘worthy candidates’.

BCM collect their Award for Building Services Consultancy of the Year (up to 100 employees) 2015

Though I really didn’t think that the judges would award the trophy to the same company for a second year running. I honestly thought that it was nice to be a finalist and be there to pass the torch on to another deserving company. I’d even mentally planned to go and congratulate the winner.
But the judges DID the unexpected. BCM was announced as the winner and I took to the stage for a second year running, to collect a matching trophy that now sits proudly next to its older sibling in our growing trophy cabinet.

And how very grateful we are that the judges made said selection, as the response from our clients and industry peers was phenomenal. Retaining the prestigious industry award for a second year truly ascertained our place as the best firm of our kind in the country. It highlights our positive contribution to the industry and shows how we are leading the way.  Clients and partner organisations recognise this, and combined with our strategic developments, we have seen further growth this year.

Our continual investment in training and development played a vital part in the win, judges praised our e-MPDS programme, run under the auspices of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers (IMechE), and how members of our team are trained as CIBSE Low Carbon Consultants. Our Knowledge Transfer Partnership with Liverpool John Moores University was also highlighted as innovative good practice.

Our double win has helped us with our recruitment also. Being able to say we are a multi-award winning firm is something that makes us stand out, as does the publicity and heightened awareness that stems from such wins.

How will I feel on the train down to the CIBSE Awards 2016, should we be fortunate enough to make the final cut again? Could the same firm possibly win THREE years in a row? Fingers crossed!


The 2015 BPA statuettes
The Building Performance Awards 2016 are open for entries until 10 September 2015 with 14 categories recognising the products, projects and people redefining excellence in the built environment.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Embodied Carbon Award: A step towards net zero carbon

Image
Now in its 15th year, the CIBSE Building Performance Awards is the only awards scheme to celebrate the measured performance of projects and products in use while celebrating the engineering consultancies and manufacturers that are contributing to a low carbon future. Michael Lonsdale Group won the Embodied Carbon Award for its pioneering work with suppliers to create a database of low embodied carbon products that enable it to recommend low carbon building services systems to its clients.  We heard from Michael Lonsdale Group about what this award means to them: Caption: Senior Environmental & Sustainability Manager, Joanna Constandis (right) and Engineering Services Director, Paul Cornwell (left) collecting the Embodied Carbon Award at BPA2022. Industries and businesses throughout the globe have begun to show ownership of their environmental agendas. The significance of the topic has been realised, identifying the need for progress towards Net Zero Carbon. So, when Dame Jo da Silv
Read more

An interview with the authors of Dynamic thermal modelling of basic blinds (TM69)

Image
To find out more about CIBSE’s newest Technical Memorandum,  Dynamic thermal modelling of basic blinds  (TM69) ,we have interviewed its main four authors: Professor Darren Woolf, Maria Gabriela da Silva Costa, Dr Bahareh Salehi and Elpida Vangeloglou . The ultimate goal of the document is to narrow the gap between predicted and actual performance of buildings, recognising the value of blinds in reducing peak energy loads and improving thermal comfort. - Elpida Vangeloglou Could you tell us about yourselves? Professor Darren Woolf: I have a number of roles and responsibilities which could lead me to describe myself as a professional juggler. My day job is Head of Building Physics at Wirth Research . We’re a wind, building physics and product design company specialising in high-fidelity computational fluid dynamics (CFD). I’ve been a visiting professor within the Building Energy Research Group at Loughborough University for over 10 years now and always enjoy the limited time I get to i
Read more

Face-to-face or remote training?

Image
With the return to the office and the ‘new normal’ of hybrid working, we have seen the reintroduction of face-to-face training. However remote courses, which enable people to be trained virtually have remained popular, with people expecting both types of training to be available. For corporate training there is no extra travelling required by employees, for either face-to-face or remote training. You can choose your own date and time, and the content can be delivered in either format. So, what are the differences between the two learning options? Preference. The main criterium for choosing face-to-face or remote training is based on people’s concentration level, preferred style of interaction, the learning environment and their digital knowledge, or simply, some people just prefer one learning format to another. Focus. People’s attention span varies. Some people concentrate better when they have someone speaking physically in front of them, whilst others find it easier to follow if t
Read more